Print Reading Mode Back to Calendar Return
  Regular-General Government   # 40.       
Board of Supervisors County Administrator  
Meeting Date: 09/29/2020  
Brief Title:    Ballot Measures
From: Patrick Blacklock, County Administrator
Staff Contact: Alexander Tengolics, Manager of Governmental Relations, x8068
Supervisorial District Impact:

Subject
Consider positions on Propositions 15, 16, 20, 21, and 25 appearing on the November 3, 2020 General Election ballot. (No general fund impact) (Blacklock/Tengolics)
Recommended Action
Consider positions on Propositions 15, 16, 20, 21, and 25 appearing on the November 3, 2020 General Election ballot. 
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
In Support of All Goals (Internal Departments Only)
Reason for Recommended Action/Background
Previously the Board had requested staff analyze Propositions 15, 16, 20, 21, and 25 appearing on the November 3, 2020 General Election ballot. A chart of the initiatives with a description, comments from the Legislative Analyst's Office and Department of Finance, positions from RCRC and CSAC, and staff notes is attached for the Board's reference (Att. A). From this analysis, staff has concluded that Propositions 15 (split tax roll for commercial properties), 16 (repeals restrictions on government decision-making policies considering race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin), 20 (increased penalties and redefinition of crime categories), and 25 (zero cash bail) will likely have direct impacts on County operations and services.  Staff has also attached the voter guide from the Secretary of State which includes summaries and pro/con arguments for all ballot measures (Att B.).

As set forth above, this item is structured for Board consideration and action in a manner that complies with state law.  The Board of Supervisors is allowed to take a position regarding ballot measures and to provide accurate, factual, and impartial information regarding the potential effects of ballot measures on the County and its constituents.  However, as the Board is aware, provisions of state law preclude Board members from expressly advocating that individual voters should vote in favor of (or against) particular measures.

Neither the District Attorney, nor the Sheriff have positions on Proposition 20 and 25. 
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
Sheriff, District Attorney, Probation

Fiscal Impact
No Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
Total cost of recommended action:    $  
Amount budgeted for expenditure:    $  
Additional expenditure authority needed:    $  
On-going commitment (annual cost):    $  
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
Attachments
Att. A. Proposition Analysis
Att. B. Voter Guide

Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Phil Pogledich Phil Pogledich 09/23/2020 09:33 AM
Elisa Sabatini Elisa Sabatini 09/23/2020 09:52 AM
Form Started By: Alexander Tengolics Started On: 09/15/2020 02:59 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/23/2020

    

Level double AA conformance,
                W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

AgendaQuick ©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc. All Rights Reserved.