Print Reading Mode Back to Calendar Return
  Time Set   # 30.       
Board of Supervisors   
Meeting Date: 09/25/2018  
Brief Title:    Amendment to Property Maintenance Code
From: Taro Echiburu, Director, Department of Community Services
Staff Contact: Leslie Lindbo, Division Director, Department of Community Services, x8581
Supervisorial District Impact:

Subject
Hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment to Section 113.4.6 in the Property Maintenance Code (Title 7, Chapter 3 of the Yolo County Code) and consider the adoption of the proposed amendment; and adopt a Statutory Exemption as the appropriate level of documentation for purposes of CEQA. (No general fund impact) (Echiburu/Lindbo)
Recommended Action
  1. Hold a public hearing to receive public comments on the proposed amendment to Section 113.4.6 in the Property Maintenance Code (Title 7, Chapter 3 of the County Code) (Attachment A);
     
  2. Adopt a Statutory Exemption as the appropriate level of environmental documentation in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines (Attachment B); and
     
  3. Adopt the ordinance amending Section 113.4.6 in the Property Maintenance Code (Attachment C).
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
Operational Excellence
Thriving Residents
Safe Communities
Sustainable Environment
Reason for Recommended Action/Background
The International Property Maintenance Code is adopted by reference and incorporated in the Yolo County Code Title 7, Chapter 3, with amendments. The amendment to the County Code is being proposed to allow the County to collect the costs associated with abatement of a dangerous structure or public nuisance. Code enforcement activities used to abate a dangerous building or public nuisance are time consuming and expensive. The Department of Community Services makes an effort to recover costs by billing the property owner. However, oftentimes the property owner does not pay the invoices. When traditional cost recovery methods are not fruitful, the Department of Community Services may place liens on properties. Liens are typically collected when a property is sold.  Since certain properties with abatement orders do not sell very often, waiting for properties to be sold to recover costs for abatement is not a sustainable method of cost recovery.

This proposed amendment to the County Code would allow the County to place a special assessment on the property's tax bill so that the costs could be collected at the same time as annual property taxes are paid. The Department of Community Services will take appropriate collection steps required by government code and allow the appropriate amount of time prior to requesting enrollment of nuisance abatement costs on the property tax bill.

For other similar tax roll assessments, the County of Yolo currently operates on the Teeter program where the County Chief Financial Officer would advance the funding of the cost recovery assessment, but retains additional penalty fees and interest. Because there is a concern that, in some cases, the cost of abatement might be large in relation to value of related property and advancement of funds through the Teeter program may put the Teeter program at risk. Therefore, the Department of Community Services is requesting exclusion from the Teeter program with adoption of this ordinance. With this exclusion, the Department of Community Services would receive any additional penalty fines and interest.  

BACKGROUND

Government Code § 25845 allows the Board of Supervisors (or an appointed County Hearing Officer) to order collection of nuisance abatement costs on the property tax bill:
 
Gov. Code § 25845: (d) If the owner fails to pay the costs of the abatement upon demand by the county, the board of supervisors may order the cost of the abatement to be specially assessed against the parcel. The assessment may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as are provided for ordinary county taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of county taxes are applicable to the special assessment.
 
Any condition resulting from a violation of the County Code is automatically deemed a nuisance, so many of the kinds of enforcement efforts could be enforced through summary abatement proceedings (Yolo County Code Sec.1-2.01).  Summary abatement proceedings are enforced by the Chief Building Official through the process spelled out in Section 113.4.4 of the International Property Maintenance Code, which Yolo County has adopted in Title 7, Chapter 3. 

In order to take advantage of the tax collection mechanism, the County must update the abatement provisions in the County Code to specifically allow for the process. Thus, the following revisions to Section 113.4.6 in the Property Maintenance Code are proposed. (strike out text indicates proposed deletions; underline text indicates proposed additions):
 
Section 113.4.6 Assessment of Costs-Lien against property and collection on tax roll. The total cost of abating a dangerous structure or declared public nuisance shall, by order of the Board of Supervisors following notice pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.4, constitute a special assessment against the premises to which it relates.  Upon recordation in the office of the County Recorder of a notice of lien, such special assessment shall constitute a lien on the property for the amount of such assessment.  The special assessment may also be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as are provided for ordinary county taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of county taxes are applicable to the special assessment.
 
The amendment to the County Code is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
County Counsel has drafted and reviewed this amendment to the County Code.
The proposed ordinance changes and staff report were also shared with the County Assessor's Office and Department of Financial Services for review and comment.

Fiscal Impact
No Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
Total cost of recommended action:    $   0
Amount budgeted for expenditure:    $   0
Additional expenditure authority needed:    $   0
On-going commitment (annual cost):    $  
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
Attachments
Att. A. Code Amendment
Att. B. Statutory Exemption
Att. C. Ordinance

Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Leslie Lindbo Leslie Lindbo 06/18/2018 09:55 AM
County Counsel Hope Welton 06/19/2018 01:17 PM
Leslie Lindbo Leslie Lindbo 08/31/2018 01:21 PM
Form Started By: eparfrey Started On: 05/22/2018 02:28 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/12/2018

    

Level double AA conformance,
                W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

AgendaQuick ©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc. All Rights Reserved.