Print Reading Mode Back to Calendar Return
  Consent-Health & Human Services   # 25.       
Board of Supervisors   
Meeting Date: 10/24/2017  
Brief Title:    2017 Local Detention Facilities Health Inspection Reports
From: Karen Larsen, Director, Health & Human Services Agency
Staff Contact: Ron Chapman, Health Officer, Health & Human Services Agency, x8765
Supervisorial District Impact:

Subject
Receive and file the 2017 Local Detention Facilities Health Inspections Report. (No general fund impact) (Larsen)
Recommended Action
Receive and file the 2017 local detention facilities health inspection reports for Yolo County pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 101045.
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
Safe Communities
 
Reason for Recommended Action/Background

The Health and Safety Code requires the Health Officer to submit annual detention inspection reports to the Board of Supervisors. These inspections are conducted to ensure an acceptable level of health and sanitary conditions in the jail detention facilities.

BACKGROUND:
The requirements and standards for local detention facilities health inspection reports are as follows:

  • The Health Officer must inspect the health and sanitary conditions in every county jail and detention facility within the County annually; and
  • Inspections are based on minimum standards and requirements prescribed by the Board of Corrections
All detention facilities in Yolo County, including all temporary holding facilities, Leinberger Minimum Security Facility, Monroe Detention Facility and Yolo County Juvenile Hall were inspected in early 2017. They are inspected annually for compliance with medical and mental health, nutrition, and environmental health regulations. Inspections were conducted by Health and human Services and Environmental Health staff.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Facilities meet all required standards.  The few violations noted in the reports have all been remediated during the requested timeframe.
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
The local detention facility inspection reports for each facility will be transmitted to the Board of Corrections and to the inspected agencies upon acceptance of this report. It is the responsibility of the Board of Corrections to ensure that deficiencies are corrected. Enforcement agencies in the cities, the Probation Department, and the Sheriff's Department cooperated with the inspection of their respective facilities. General Services participated in the necessary corrections in the county detention facilities.

Fiscal Impact
No Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
Total cost of recommended action:    $  
Amount budgeted for expenditure:    $  
Additional expenditure authority needed:    $  
On-going commitment (annual cost):    $  
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
$0
Attachments
Att. A.City of Davis Detention Facility Inspection
Att. B. W. Sac Detention Facility Inspection
Att. C. Woodland Detention Facility Inspection
Att. D. Court Holding Detention Facility Inspection
Att. E. Juvenile Hall Detention Facility Inspection
Att. F. Leinberger Jail Inspection
Att. G. Monroe Detention Facility Inspection
Att. H. U.C. Davis Detention Facility Inspection

Form Review
Form Started By: csechler Started On: 09/21/2017 11:45 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/06/2017

    

Level double AA conformance,
                W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

AgendaQuick ©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc. All Rights Reserved.