Print Reading Mode Back to Calendar Return
  Public Hearings   7.       
LAFCO
Meeting Date: 02/27/2020  

Information
SUBJECT
Public Hearing to Consider the Springlake Fire Protection District's (FPD's) Change of Organization Proposal to Change from an Independent District to a Dependent District to the County of Yolo (LAFCo No 934)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends changing the Springlake Fire Protection District (FPD) from an independent district to a dependent district to the County of Yolo.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Springlake FPD is an independent district with its own five (5) member board of directors. All of the FPD services are contracted out to the City of Davis, City of Woodland and UC Davis. The City of Woodland also provides staff and accounting services to the FPD.

The Springlake FPD has struggled in recent years to maintain sufficient board members to achieve a quorum for its meetings. LAFCo, Springlake FPD and the Yolo County District 3 Office (Supervisor Sandy) have had ongoing conversations for years about how best to resolve this problem. Governance options considered include: (1) changing the number of FPD board member seats from five to three; (2) consolidating the FPD with another adjacent one; or (3) changing the governance from an independent district to a dependent district so the Board of Supervisors could act for the FPD if need be. After much consideration by the FPD board, it has petitioned LAFCo to change its governance to a dependent district under Yolo County (i.e. Option 3).  
BACKGROUND
On December 17, 2018 the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting the Springlake FPD Change of Organization to a dependent district. The intention is for the Board of Supervisors to delegate its authority back to a fire commission, essentially re-appointing the existing FPD board members as fire commissioners. However, it needs to be understood that ultimate authority would rest with the Board of Supervisors and it can take such delegation back if desired for any reason. This would also allow the FPD to continue functioning should the fire commission lose its quorum and become unable to take action.

Factors to be Considered
In accordance with Government Code Section 56668, the factors to be considered in the review of a proposal shall include, but is not limited to, all of the following:
  • Population, land use, natural boundaries, proximity to other populated areas, and likelihood of significant growth in the area during the next 10 years;
  • The need for organized community services, the adequacy of governmental services and controls in the area, the probable effect of annexation and alternative courses of action;
  • The effect of the proposed action (and alternative actions) on the adjacent areas, social and economic interests and local governmental structure of the county;
  • The conformity of the proposal and its effects with adopted commission policies on providing planned, orderly and efficient patters or urban development;
  • The effect of the proposal on maintaining the physical and economic integrity of agricultural lands;
  • Creation of "islands" or corridors of unincorporated territory;
  • A regional transportation plan;
  • The proposal's consistency with city or county general and specific plans;
  • The sphere of influence of any applicable local agency;
  • The ability of the receiving entity to provide services and the sufficiency of revenues for those services;
  • Availability of water supplies;
  • The extent to which the proposal will affect a city in achieving its regional housing needs as determined by its council of governments;
  • Any information or comments from landowners, voters or residents of the affected territory;
  • Any information relating to existing land use designations;
  • The extent to which the proposal will promote environmental justice, meaning the fair treatment tof people of all races, cultures and incomes with the respect to the provision of public services; and
  • Any local hazard plan or safety element of a general plan that identify land as a very high fire hazard zone.
Yolo LAFCo's local standards of evaluation for proposals (Section 2.0) elaborates on these state mandated factors with the following additional standards:
  • Favoring municipal services by cities in urbanized areas rather than the County or special districts;
  • Consider not only present service needs of the area under consideration, but shall also consider future services which may be required to take care of future growth or expansion;
  • Requiring a service plan that describes the extension, financing and timing of services;
  • SACOG's regional housing needs for the agency, recent update (and certification) of the agency's housing element, whether the agency's inclusionary housing ordinance complies with SACOG's Affordable Housing Compact, the degree to which the proposal meets the agency's "low income" and "very low income" housing targets, and the extent to which the proposal advances or inhibits the agency's housing element; and
  • Consistency with the Agricultural Conservation Policy.
Analysis
The proposal would have no effect on growth patterns, land use or agricultural land. It does not change any services provided by Springlake FPD or its service territory. This proposal involves a governance change only, similar to establishing a subsidiary district although this would be to Yolo County and not a city. This LAFCo action would not affect any of the existing Springlake FPD contracts, which would continue enforce per existing terms. Existing property taxes and any assessments/fees would also not be affected by this action. The governance change would become effective at the beginning of the next fiscal year on July 1, 2020.

Protest Proceedings
The proposal is subject to protest proceedings if approved by LAFCo. If approved at the hearing, LAFCo will give notice (via a 1/8th page display ad in the Woodland Democrat) of the protest hearing to all residents in the Springlake FPD territory. The Executive Officer would likely set the protest hearing for our May 28, 2020 meeting. If protest is filed by less than 25% of the registered voters or landowners, the Commission shall order the change of organization. If between 25% - 50% of the voters/landowners file protests, the Commission shall order the change of organization subject to an election. Over 50% protest automatically terminates the proposal.

CEQA
CEQA Public Resources Code Section 15320 (Class 20) provides for a Categorical Exemption for Changes in Organization of local agencies that do not change the geographical area in which previously existing powers are exercised. One of the specific examples cited includes "establishment of a subsidiary district". Therefore, staff recommends this proposal is exempt from CEQA.
Attachments
ATT A-Springlake FPD Change of Organization Reso 2020-01
ATT B - Yolo County BOS Reso Supporting Change of Org

Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Christine Crawford (Originator) Christine Crawford 02/13/2020 11:38 AM
Form Started By: Christine Crawford Started On: 01/08/2020 01:00 PM
Final Approval Date: 02/13/2020

    

Level double AA conformance,
                W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

AgendaQuick ©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc. All Rights Reserved.