Print Reading Mode Back to Calendar Return
  Regular-General Government   # 31.       
Board of Supervisors County Administrator  
Meeting Date: 02/09/2021  
Brief Title:    Redistricting Update
From: Patrick Blacklock, County Administrator
Staff Contact: Alexander Tengolics, Manager of Governmental Relations, County Administrator's Office, x8068
Supervisorial District Impact:

Subject
Receive an update on redistricting, redistricting commission mechanisms, and related legislation and provide direction to staff on next steps. (No general fund impact) (Blacklock/Tengolics)
Recommended Action
Receive an update on redistricting, redistricting commission mechanisms, and related legislation and provide direction to staff on next steps.
Strategic Plan Goal(s)
County Mandated Service
Reason for Recommended Action/Background
At the January 12, 2021 Board of Supervisors meeting, the Board expressed an interest in proceeding with a redistricting advisory commission and requested staff return with estimates of approximate changes in population from the prior census, as well as a list of issues for consideration as the Board further contemplates establishing a redistricting commission.

Below are the population changes by jurisdiction from 2010-2019 per Census data (staff did not have sufficient data to make an estimate for population changes by supervisorial districts):
 
Jurisdiction 2010 Population 2019 Population Change % Change
Davis 65,622 69,413 3,791 6%
West Sacramento 48,744 53,519 4,775 10%
Winters 6,624 7,315 691 10%
Woodland 55,468 60,458 4,990 9%
Yolo (Unincorporated) 24,391 29,795 5,404 22%
Total 200,849 220,500 19,651 10%
 
The Board also raised several issues which could be used as a framework to guide the redistricting process in addition to existing state statue (Elec. Code, §§ 21500(c)), that stipulates the following:
  • First, to the extent practicable, Supervisorial districts must be geographically contiguous;
  • Second, to the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest must be respected in a manner that minimizes its division;
  • Third, to the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of a city or census designated place must be respected in a manner that minimizes its division;
  • Fourth, district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents; and
  • Fifth, to the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the above criteria, districts must be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.
The additional considerations raised by the Board included:
  • No more than two districts intersecting a city
  • No more than two cities within each district
  • Each district includes incorporated and unincorporated areas
As the Board continues its deliberations, additional considerations can be added to this framework to provide further direction to a redistricting commission.

As the Board may recall from the January 12 presentation (Att. A), the Board has discretion in creating the commission appointment process and advisory redistricting commissions can be directly appointed. Should the Board wish to proceed with an advisory commission staff will return to the Board on February 23 with a resolution establishing the commission; if the Board wishes to directly appoint, the Board could also do so at the February 23 meeting. If the Board chooses to directly appoint, absent specific direction from the Board, staff will assume a five-member advisory commission with each Supervisor appointing one member. Alternatively, if the Board prefers to establish an advisory commission via an application process, staff would need additional direction as to the composition of the commission and additional time to notice and accept applications. The only legal constraint on advisory commission membership is that elected officials, their family members, staff, and paid campaign staff cannot serve on the commission (Elections Code section 23002).

Below is an updated tentative redistricting schedule. Following the establishment of a commission, staff can work with the commission to develop a more detailed schedule.
  •  February 9, 2021
    • Staff returns with additional information as requested for further Board deliberation on the preferred redistricting structure
  • February-May 2021
    • Selection of commission members (if applicable), initial meeting of commission to provide any Board direction/considerations, review process and legal requirements, set future meeting/outreach dates
  • April-July 2021
    • Receive Census data
  • May-October 2021 (following receipt of Census data and formation of commission)
    • Outreach/hearings (minimum of four hearings); drafting of maps; potential update to BOS prior to fourth hearing
  • November 2021
    • Approval of final maps
Collaborations (including Board advisory groups and external partner agencies)
County Counsel

Fiscal Impact
No Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Impact (Expenditure)
Total cost of recommended action:    $  
Amount budgeted for expenditure:    $  
Additional expenditure authority needed:    $  
On-going commitment (annual cost):    $  
Source of Funds for this Expenditure
Attachments
Att. A. January 12, 2021 Staff Report
Att. B. Presentation

Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Phil Pogledich Phil Pogledich 02/02/2021 03:01 PM
Elisa Sabatini Elisa Sabatini 02/03/2021 10:17 AM
Form Started By: Alexander Tengolics Started On: 01/25/2021 03:07 PM
Final Approval Date: 02/03/2021

    

Level double AA conformance,
                W3C WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

AgendaQuick ©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc. All Rights Reserved.